<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[The Imaging Source Astronomy Cameras Comments]]></title>
    <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Latest comments posted to The Imaging Source Astronomy Cameras web site]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:23:28 +0200</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:23:28 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    
    <generator>The Imaging Source</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <ttl>3600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by John Earl]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20120427/mars-and-saturn-april-2012/#comment_987</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David!</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:23:28 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Denis Tremblay]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/products/software/#comment_985</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to thank the end users writing comments regarding Mac software not available for the cameras on this site. I was going to invest a fair amount of money here, and it will now not happen.</p><p>Thanks again</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:07:27 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Gerhard Kemmerer]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20110228/splendid-solar-photographs/#comment_984</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting how solar flares and activity are associated with sun spots, which do the opposite - reducing flames and often drawing them in. Very similar to low presure systems on earth giving rise to weather activity. The background forces of matter in both phenomenon are identical and provide the key to understanding a unification of theories about atoms, gravity etc. Ancient Science and Cosmology - gerhardsk@hotmail.com - your photographs are well above average in quality.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 05:04:57 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Jordi Cornelles]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20120507/winner-of-dmk-21au618as-announced/#comment_983</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello from Valencia,Spain! Thank you very much for the prize. I'm so excited for that. I've been using a Toucam Pro for eight years,but now I wil improve the quality of my pictures a lot. I promise to send some of my works made with this camera as soon as possible. Best regards from Spain. Jordi Cornelles, President of the Astronomical Association of Valencia (www.astroava.org)</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 23:43:09 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Michael Jenkins]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20120316/breathtaking-solar-animation-of-ar-11302/#comment_976</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Excellence images like the video I have a long way to go to get images like yours well done</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Phil Leigh]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/products/usb/#comment_975</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What would be the &quot;best&quot; of your Colour USB camera for planetary imaging?</p><p>I understand that a high frame rate is better, but what about resolution? (I am using 1500mm scope with 2x Barlow).</p><p>I've been told that 640x480 is best - is that correct? What are the tradeoffs?</p><p>thanks</p><p>Phil</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:06:13 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by David Bood]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20120427/mars-and-saturn-april-2012/#comment_974</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>wow great images</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:35:35 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Daniel Kaganovich]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20081220/splendid-solar-image-from-moscow/#comment_972</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>New pictures from Alexey Prudnikov</p><p>http://www.astronomy.ru/forum/index.php?action=media;sa=media;in=1141</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:47:58 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Roberto Serri]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/blog/archive/20120423/another-picture-of-mars-from-italy/#comment_971</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Not from Italy but from Canada</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:15:52 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Comment by Grant Privett]]></title>
      <link>http://www.astronomycameras.com/products/usb/#comment_966</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Could you tell me please if any of your cameras have a bit depth and dynamic range greater than 8 bits pleased. Would prefer to use a camera that was 10 or 12 bits.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:38:51 +0200</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

